Robin Rosenberg grew up with superhero comics. Later she shared them with her children, and after becoming a clinical psychologist, she studied them through the lens of psychology and discovered that “superhero stories are about morality and loyalty, about self-doubt and conviction of beliefs. I also saw that, like any good fiction, the sagas of superheroes bring us out of ourselves and connect us with something larger than ourselves, something more universal.”
Rosenberg published “We Need a Hero” in the current Smithsonian Magazine http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/The-Psychology-Behind-Superhero-Origin-Stories-187938991.html#ixzz2IrHHrBBI. The article inspired me to read The Psychology of Superheroes a collection of essays that Rosenberg edited in 2008 on what makes these caped crusaders tick.
Sometimes it seems that superheroes can’t get no satisfaction, but is that accurate? Not according to the opening essay in the collection, “The Positive Psychology of Superheroes,” by Christopher Peterson and Nansook Park. “One of the defining features of a superhero is an over-riding mission to serve the larger world and to defend it. In this sense, superheroes have profoundly meaningful lives.”
Peterson and Park assert that meaning is more important than pleasure in leading a satisfying life. That’s a good thing, because with a few exceptions, superheroes are challenged on the relationship front. I’ve always thought it’s the flaws embodied in the secret identities of Clark Kent and Peter Parker that bonds us to these characters. In one sense, they’re just like us, and their stories suggest that we too may choose the highroad.
Though superpowers isolate them from others, sometimes superheroes band together with superior results, according to the second essay in the collection, “The Benefits of a Group,” by Dr. Wind Goodfriend. This article may shed some light on why The Justice League of America functions more efficiently than your team at work or committees at church.
Another topic discussed in the book is the question of nurture vs. nature in the development of superhero psychology. Superman may have his powers through genetics, how did he come to use them for altruistic rather than narrow and selfish ends? Did he inherit those qualities too, or were they a result of his wholesome upbringing on a farm in America’s heartland? What would have happened if his pod had landed in New York City?
Good and evil are usually clearly drawn in superhero stories, but not always. In “Anti-Heroism in the Continuum of Good and Evil,” Dr. Michael Spivey and Steve Knowlton discuss the ambiguous, gray-zone nature of super anti-heroes and sympathetic villains (think of Darth Vader and Gollum). Each of the 18 essays in The Psychology of Superheroes addresses some facet of the super-psyche that you may or may not have wondered about.
Humans have relished hero tales for millennia. Superman joined the ranks 75 years ago, and if you’ve been to the cineplex lately, you know that his saga is going to continue this summer. The trailer for Man of Steel 2013 zeroes in on Clark’s inner struggles to understand who he is and why he is here. Earlier incarnations of Superman did not live in a world of such moral ambiguity and mistrust of the government, themes which place this telling squarely in the 21st century.
As The Psychology of Superheroes makes clear, what we really admire is not the superpowers but the hero, the one who overcomes their doubts and demons and then acts to make the world a better place. This book is a fascinating read in its own right and will whet your appetite for the new movie. It will give you some new perspectives on movies you’ve seen in the past as well as the comic books that once inspired some of us to run around wearing capes made out of bedsheets.
SoundEagle would like to add from experience that If or when we behaved and acted as outliers (or as superheroes) against the grain of society or social moray, many or most of our relatives, friends and (ex-)colleagues would simply not have the time, capacity and courage to cultivate or possess the wisdom and mentality to like, understand, tolerate, empathize or sympathize with, and/or support our way of life, worldview and philosophy. This would be true even if or when we had to sacrifice our careers and wellbeing as the result of sustained involvements in helping, saving, innovating, protecting, appraising, connecting, exposing, contradicting, validating and promoting some peoples and projects in various contexts and situations. It could also be true if or when we had done a lot of voluntary, non-profit, non-commercial and/or pro bono works for extended periods, and as a result, has/had forgone earning a very large amount of income over the working life.
That’s a very interesting observation. I don’t know enough of the personal life of well known reformers to be able to add examples. I understand Gandhi’s family life was sometimes rocky. On the other hand, I believe Martin Luther King was happily married.
Thank you, Morgan, for contemplating the plausibility, reliability and/or validity of SoundEagle’s observation with a couple of eminent historical figures as examples.
I haven’t got around to reading the Smithsonian article yet (I will!), but I appreciated your summary of ‘The Psychology of Superheroes’. I always think of comicbook heroes as descendants of folktale protagonists, who are likewise presented with moral dilemmas to wrestle with and altruistic situations to demonstrate their compassion.
My limited experience with US comicbook heroes, from childhood encounters in Hong Kong in the 50s to adult appreciation in the UK in the 70s and 80s, revealed that life for superheroes had become more complex (as well as more graphically violent) than in their Golden Age post-war years. Now that serious comicdom has been dignified with the moniker Graphic Novel (and prices risen in consequence) I rarely get round to viewing them, but my impression is that the situation has just intensified.
Pingback: The Psychology of Superheroes: An Unauthorized Exploration | Science Book a Day
“There is a superhero in all of us, we just
need the courage to put on the cape.”
Siegel & Shuster 1938
But it comes at a cost.
Nearly sixty years ago, at the dawn of the Computer Age, I became the youngest intel analyst in US history, complete with a TOP SECRET codeword security clearance.
High Noon in the Cold War — My fellow “Sherlocks” and I were facing professional extinction. Out of desperation, I had to do something. In the great American teenage tradition, on paper and then in person, I became…
Super Analyst – The TOP SECRET Hero
Endowed with amazing analytical powers, taking on the sneaky, sinister Soviets was a constant challenge, but the ultimate threat came from the tidal wave of technology rolling right at us. Computers! These ‘Sheens’ would soon make all “radio intercept analysts” obsolete!
Fighting to the very end, I hung up my mask and cape in 1967. Within a year, the US Air Force Security Service began to disappear and hasn’t been heard from since.
Back home in NYC, I saw a “Help Wanted” sign and went in for an interview. With my military experience, computer knowledge and language-learning skills, I’d make an ideal Peace Corps volunteer.
The first question. “Have you ever been a member of an intelligence-gathering organization?”
And when I told her.
“Sorry, no spies in the Peace Corps. Try again in eight years.”
[Never one to give up, I’d later serve in Costa Rica and then Brazil!]
The essence of being a superhero is the impact
it has on the rest of your life.
“Go on again with fresh courage,”