Gotta love this, even if some of the filmmakers have way too much time on their hands…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD9qvF4z8cE
Much better than the Jingle Cats, don’t you think?
Gotta love this, even if some of the filmmakers have way too much time on their hands…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD9qvF4z8cE
Much better than the Jingle Cats, don’t you think?
Having slept through Black Friday, the next big event on my calendar is the Mayan apocalypse, scheduled for December 21.
I had no intention of blogging about this until I received the Winter 2012 issue of the University of Oregon Quarterly, where an article by Alice Tallmadge, “Doomsday or Deliverance?” discusses this prophecy in the context of end-of-the-world folklore.
Associate professor Dan Wojcik, director of the UO folklore program, plans to travel to Chichen Itza, one of a huge number of visitors expected for the event, which for some heralds the shift to a higher world age, in the same spirit as the Harmonic Convergence of 1987. The main organizer of that event, as well as the biggest publicist of 12/21/12, was Jose Arguelles (1939-2011). In his obituary, the New York Times described his philosophy as “an eclectic amalgm of Mayan and Aztec cosmology, the I Ching, the Book of Revelation, ancient-astronaut narratives, and more.”
On the other end of the spectrum, Alice Tallmadge reports that sales of survivalist goods have spiked in recent months. A recent Reuters poll found that 15% of people worldwide, and 22% of Americans believe the world will end during their lifetime. The apocalypse has been a feature of Christian theology from the start, but professor Wojcik notes a recent uptick in secular end-time beliefs: pandemics, overpopulation, and climate change are seen as threats to the planet without any hope of spiritual redemption.
Things that have a beginning have an end, from gnats, to humans, to stars, and all of creation in the western view of time as linear. When the world survives a predicted ending date, the error is put down to miscalculation; the expectation persists. What is it about end-time predictions that continue to fascinate most of us and motivate many believers? The old saying, “Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me” doesn’t hold in this realm.
I wonder if it parallels our continuing love for disaster film? Stories of terrible struggle and danger where we get to imagine ourselves among the survivors or among the happily raptured, coming through the ordeal to enjoy “a new heaven and earth.” The ultimate do-over.
They don’t get any better than one of my all time favorite “disaster films,” made decades before the phrase was coined: San Francisco (1936), with Clark Gable, Spencer Tracy, and Jeanette MacDonald surviving the 1906 earthquake.
Here’s hoping all our December disasters turn out as well!
And finally, for extra credit, here’s a different kind of celebration, with REM performing “It’s the End of the World As We Know It (and I Feel Fine). Enjoy!

When I was in grade school, the lucky kids had Hostess snack foods in their lunch. I remember one guy who would shove an entire Twinkie into mouth, partly to gross out the girls and partly to gloat over those whose mothers, like mine, packed boring things like carrots and celery.
Once I got to junior high, with its snack bar window, I could indulge, and that was when I made a terrible discovery – Twinkies just weren’t that good. Oblivious to the dangers of breaking a filling, I generally spent my pocket money on corn nuts instead. And yet, I will miss Hostess. Not just because the cupcakes are good, and you gotta love any snack food called “Ding Dongs.” Not just because the local Hostess bakery will close and thousands of people around the country will lose their jobs.
There’s something endearing about the little gold icon, an image of youth, when there were do-overs in terms of diet and teeth and most other things. I would also argue that the same font of creativity that brought us Twinkies and Elvis impersonators brought us microchips and iPhones as well. Say it loud and say it proud: “Only in America!”
Hostess cared about its customers! I remember hearing on NPR’s Science Friday that the company conducted experiments to determine how long you could safely nuke a Twinkie. Seems that many enjoyed warming their Twinkies, but when left in the microwave too long, they would explode. After careful research, Hostess reported that 60 seconds or less was generally safe.
The reputation of Twinkies was forever tarnished by the notorious “Twinkie defense” used in a sensational murder trial in 1978. On November 27, disgruntled San Francisco City Supervisor, Dan White, climbed into City Hall through a first floor window, circumventing the newly installed metal detectors. He carried a pistol and fatally shot Mayor George Moscone and fellow Supervisor, Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man ever elected to California public office.
At the trial, White’s defense attorneys argued diminished capacity resulting from depression and a steady diet of junk food, most notably Twinkies. In what is widely regarded as a great miscarriage of justice, the jury found White guilty of manslaughter rather than first degree murder. After serving five years of a seven year sentence, White – “the most hated man in San Francisco history,” according to the Chronicle – committed suicide.
None of this was the fault of Twinkies, and yet the growing awareness surrounding the trial, that sugary snacks, like cigarettes, might not be in our best interests helped doom the little “Golden Sponge Cake with Creamy Filling.” I gotta confess, I long ago joined the bran muffin crowd. I munch on carrots voluntarily now.
Twinkies were the brainchild of James A. Dewar of the Continental Baking Company, makers of Wonder Bread and the Hostess line of snack foods. Machines used to make cream-filled strawberry shortcakes were idle when strawberries were out of season, so in 1933, Dewar used them to make banana cream filled snacks which sold, two for a nickel. During WWII, when bananas were rationed, Hostess switched to vanilla creme, a move so popular they never went back.
Twinkies popularity grew in the 1950’s when Hostess sponsored the Howdy Doody Show. During the nuclear scare of the ’60’s, Twinkies were stored in bomb shelters, because according to Hostess, they “stay fresh forever.” If Twinkies are as iconic of my generation as Howdy Doody, it’s also true that now we worry more about preservatives than thermonuclear war.
So long, little guy, and happy trails! Someday, enterprising history students will rediscover you in the course of their doctoral research in 20th century popular culture. They will come to know, as we do, that there are worse ways to meet the challenges of life than with a smile on your face and a golden bread-thing in your hand!

There’s still time to get tickets for the September 20 Ig Nobel Prize award ceremony at Harvard, where ten researchers will receive recognition for unusual discoveries. The prizes are the brainchild of Marc Abrahams, editor and co-founder of “The Annals of Improbable Research” and author of a new book, This is Improbable: Cheese String Theory, Magnetic Chickens and Other WTF Research.
The ten Ig Nobel winners, whose identity has not been revealed, will receive their certificates from “real” Nobel laureates. According to Abrahams, some dedicated scientists hold awards in both categories. He cites Andre Geim and Michael Berry, two UK physicists, who won an Ig Nobel in 2000 for using magnets to levitate a frog. Ten years later, Geim and a student won a Nobel prize for producing graphene (two-dimensional carbon) in sufficient quantities to study.

Dr. Elena Bodnar, with her Ig Nobel prize winning bra that quickly converts to a protective face mask.
Past Ig Nobel winners who plan to attend this years ceremony include Dr. Bodnar, pictured above, as well as:

Basile Audoly and Sebastien Neukirch won a 2006 Ig Nobel for research on why spaghetti, when broken, often splits into more than two pieces.
Marc Abrahams
Marc Abrahams says the Ig Nobel committee is looking for research and inventions that make people laugh and then make them think. “We also hope to spur people’s curiosity, and to raise the question: How do you decide what’s important and what’s not, and what’s real and what’s not — in science and everywhere else?”
A very good question! To learn more about this year’s prizes, check here: http://www.improbable.com/ig/2012/
Sometimes a cartoon is worth a thousand words.
From the excellent work of Wiley Miller on his comic strip, Non Sequitar. http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2012/06/04
That’s right, a winner in the: Caption the Condom Cartoon Contest (announced here last week http://wp.me/pYql4-1MT).
There were at least a few positive outcomes after Rush Limbaugh’s slur of law student, Sandra Fluke, which inspired the contest.
1) One positive result: I got to use some great alliteration in the contest name.
2) Another bit of good news: eleven sponsors bailed on Rush after his outburst. Unfortunately, a Republican Super-Pac stepped in with bailout money. Apparently some consider Limbaugh’s mouth too big to fail.
3) And best of all, at least for this blog, Camille w1ns a $10 Amazon gift card with her caption:
If only Rush’s parents had known how to use me properly…
![]()
Please stop by Camilles blog and see what other clever things she is up to: http://poppycockandsomesuchnonsense.wordpress.com/
And thank you all for your entries and for stopping by to share a laugh!
My recent resolution to stay more positive on this blog is challenged almost every time I pick up a newspaper or turn on the evening news. Believing that laughter is better than tears, and in keeping with this week’s headlines, I’m announcing a little contest:
Thanks to istockphoto.com for this royalty-free cartoon
I’m guessing that everyone who isn’t living with wolves knows why poor little Mr. Happy is sad. I will award a $10 Amazon gift card to the best caption for this cartoon, submitted as a comment to this post by midnight PST, Saturday, March 10. Multiple entries are encouraged.
***
If you have been on vacation, or on a media fast, or if you live in a country that still has real political debate, you may not have heard of the controversy over rules that require health-care providers to cover contraception even if it violates the conscience of certain faith-based employers. Throwing gasoline on the fire, conservative talk show host, Rush Limbaugh, called Sandra Fluke, a third-year law student, a “slut” and “a prostitute” after she testified in favor of insurance coverage of birth control. http://www.sacbee.com/2012/03/03/4307985/contraception-fight-intensifies.html
So now that you know the story, what are you waiting for? Get busy writing your captions!